Competitiveness study: another poor showing for Pennsylvania

April 25th, 2010 by ymartin Leave a reply »

Pennsylvania continues to lose ground in the economic competitiveness race, raising the stakes even higher in the upcoming debate over the 2010-11 state budget.

According to the 2010 ALEC-Laffer State Economic Competitiveness Index, Pennsylvania ranked 46th for economic performance (no change from 2009) and 43rd for economic outlook (a one position drop from last year). Since 2008, the Commonwealth has dropped seven positions in the economic outlook category.

The annual study examines 15 policy variables that have a proven impact on the migration of capital — both investment and human — into and out of states. The state rankings are an equally weighted combination of these variables, and each of the factors is influenced directly by state lawmakers through the legislative process.

Pennsylvania ranked near the back of the pack in most of the 15 variables. The state received its lowest marks for its top marginal corporate income tax rate; recently legislated tax changes; debt service as a share of tax revenue; and for not being a right-to-work state.

The study is more evidence that state lawmakers must make economic growth and job creation a priority in the upcoming state budget debate. PA Chamber members are urging lawmakers to reduce government spending; resist placing additional tax burdens on job creators; and make sure that cost-control measures are part of the solutions to the fiscal challenges facing the Commonwealth. Specifically, the looming public pension crisis and the solvency concerns facing the state’ UC Trust Fund (which is broke and operating with more than $2 billion borrowed from the federal government) are two areas in which elected officials must do more than simply throw money at the problem.

The authors of the competitiveness index stressed the importance of controlled government spending in the study’s conclusion: “When government expenditures grow beyond the private sector’s ability to pay for them, economic growth suffers. Put simply, growth in government crowds out growth in the private sector. Nationwide, the burdens from total federal, state and local government expenditures have risen by more than 5 percent of GDP within the past two years — an extraordinarily high growth rate. These increased government expenditures will reduce private-sector growth and increase overall unemployment throughout the United States.”

PA Chamber members recognize the tremendous challenges ahead in the effort to restore the Commonwealth to fiscal and economic health. They are prepared to roll up their collective sleeves and work with state lawmakers to do what is needed to move Pennsylvania forward and ensure a prosperous private sector.

2010 ALEC-Laffer State Economic Competitiveness Index 10 best states:
Utah, Colorado, Arizona, South Dakota, Florida, Wyoming, Idaho, Virginia, Georgia and Tennessee

2010 ALEC-Laffer State Economic Competitiveness Index 10 worst states
Oregon, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Maine, Rhode Island, California, Illinois, New Jersey, Vermont and New York.

Return to top

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)
Advertisement

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.